切換簡體 商家登錄

楊清泉律師專欄:DISABLED CLIENT FILES CHAPTER 13 FOR SECURED HIGH INTEREST LOANS(Ⅰ)

楊清泉律師事務所

DISABLED CLIENT FILES CHAPTER 13 FOR SECURED HIGH INTEREST LOANS;YOUNG CLIENT FILES CHAPTER 7 TO DISCHARGE $30K CREDIT CARDS(Ⅰ)

CLIENT NO. 1

Client was disabled when he was 55, which was 7 years ago. He receives $1,600 of disability pay monthly. Since he is single, he doesn’t really have too many expenses. In fact, he almost has no expenses because he lives in the family home for free so he is rent-free. He doesn’t have to pay for food, shelter or clothing, since he has a loving family that takes care of his needs. His sole possession is an old truck, which he treasures. He uses the truck to get around, hunting, camping and fishing. He actually has a life that many people may envy, but once in a while, his disability gets the better part of him. Once in a while, he gets an uncontrollable urge to borrow money from check cashing. Recently, he borrowed $3K from one check cashing office at 111% annual interest. You read that right: 111%. You get net proceeds of less than $3K, and in 12 months you will owe $6.3K! These loan sharks are not exactly like Mother Theresa. In addition to being on the hook for hyper interest, disabled client is also required to sign a power of attorney authorizing the loan shark to sell his truck as soon as client defaults on the loan. Client has also turned over the pink slip to the truck because he has secured the high interest loan with his truck. As soon as he got the loan proceeds, client went to Pechanga, had a good time there, and lost all of it gambling.

Client is good for two months. On the third month, he gets another uncontrollable urge to borrow money from check cashing. So, client goes to another check cashing store and borrows another $3K. The problem is, he only has one truck, and again, the check-cashing store asks that he give his truck as collateral. But since his disability has given him two distinct personalities when he is not taking his medication, client’s second personality whom we will call client 1-B, as distinguished from client 1-A who mortgaged the truck the first time to the first check cashing store, decides to mortgage the same truck to the second check cashing store. This time, the interest is less than the first. It’s only 98.95% annual interest. That’s 12.05% savings on interest per year right there. Client 1-B can’t wait to tell client 1-A later that he got a better deal on the loan!

Client 1-A has stopped paying the installment payments on the first loan since February. Client 1-B has stopped paying the installment payments on the second loan since March. Both client 1-A and client 1-B now agree that it’s panic time because both of them signed power of attorneys allowing the 2 loan sharks to sell the same truck upon default. To prevent the loan sharks from selling his beloved truck, client decides to seek bankruptcy relief. A Chapter 7 will not work because the same truck secures both loan sharks. Chapter 7 will discharge both loans, but all hell will break lose when two loan sharks sell the same car. Two buyers will claim ownership over the same truck. We do not want to have this kind of situation. It’s hard enough to get my software to understand that the same truck has been mortgaged twice.

Chapter 13 will protect his truck by preventing the exercise of the power of attorney to sell the truck, and allowing the two secured loans to be paid over 60 months at zero interest. Both client 1-A and client 1-B decide to file for Chapter 13 because both concur that zero percent interest is a lot better than 111% and 98.95% interest! They agree to disagree on many things, but on zero interest, there is no argument from either one.

【續下頁】
 

把此文章分享到:

關於 楊清泉律師事務所