切換簡體 商家登錄

【破产法】CLIENT WITH $40K CREDIT CARDS EXAMINES DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CHP 7, CHP 13 AND DEBT SETTLEMENT | 楊清泉律師事務所

10/16/2020     楊清泉律師事務所

Client is 42 and is going through a divorce. It was a short 2-year marriage. He has moved out of the marital home and now lives by himself. He has a toddler who is with his wife, so he expects to pay child support. There is not alimony because the

marriage has not lasted 10 years. So, if you are the higher income spouse and wondering why your spouse has not filed for 

divorce despite all of your philandering, it’s because in California you need to be married at least for a decade to claim alimony 

or spousal support from the higher income spouse. In fact, I do have a client who was hit with divorce papers right after the 10-

year period was reached, and being the higher income spouse, he has to pay $1,500 of alimony to his wife. We had to 

reorganize his financial affairs under Chapter 13 to handle $60K of credit cards, and to strip off $100K of 2nd trust deed. It is 

unusual nowadays to be able to strip junior liens because of the soaring prices of houses in Southern California. But in his 

case, a current appraisal report showed that his house was at least $10K under water after considering the balance of the first 

trust deed. His house had a fair market value of $220K while the balance owed on the first trust deed is $230K, leaving the 2nd 

trust deed, a HELOC line , of $100K completely unsecured. 




Let’s go back to the client with the short-lived marriage. He left his wife a year ago and has not paid $40K of credit cards since 

then. He asks me what he can do to handle the $40K debt because his creditors have started to threaten lawsuits. After 

interviewing him, I determined that his was a classic Chapter 7 case. So I advised him to file for Chapter 7 to get a fresh start 

in life without the $40K of credit card debt. In Chapter 7, the court will discharge the entire $40K, i.e., he doesn’t have to pay 

them at all. Here, the law gives him a chance to start all over again, without the burden of accumulated debt so he can become 

productive again. $40K requires him a minimum payment of $1200 a month. But obviously, he hasn’t paid the cards anymore 

for the last 12 months since he left the marital home. So now that he is getting demand letters to pay, he is looking at the 

possibility of wage garnishments on the horizon. 




His income is a gross of $3,500 a month. Even for a single person, his gross income is below median for California. In 

California, a single person without any dependent living with him or her earning a gross of less than $4,000 a month is eligible 

for Chapter 7 under the means test. Of course, a single person making a gross of more than $4,000 a month, can still qualify 

for Chapter 7 under different circumstances. But for this client, we do not have to bother with other circumstances because 

$3,500 is less than $4,000, which is the applicable threshold. Since it’s below the threshold, the means test will conclude that 

there is no presumption of abuse for this client to file for Chapter 7. The presumption of abuse, if it arises, presents a major 

obstacle to a successful Chapter 7, although this is not to say that the obstacle cannot be overcome. We don’t want that kind 

of situation as much as possible.




There is no problem regarding house-ownership as client never owned one. If there was an issue regarding house-ownership 

with non-exempt equity, the preferred filing for debt relief would be Chapter 13, not 7. Client said that he was worried that he 

could not get new credit after filing but admitted that his current credit score was below 500. I informed him that with Chapter 

7, he would be getting new preapproved credit cards within months of discharge from banks and lenders that specialize in 

issuing cards to debtors who have just filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 7. These would have annual fees and higher interest 

than normal cards. And buying a car can be done immediately after discharge but interest rate would also be higher than for 

one with good credit. With Chapter 7 discharge, his credit score would increase pretty fast. It would go to 500 on filing and 

increase to 580 in one year. On year two, his credit score would be 620. On year 5 to 7, his credit score, if he handled new 

debt timely, would reach and surpass 700 which is very good. And on year 10, the fact of Chapter 7 filing would disappear 

from the credit report. On year 3, he can qualify to buy a house at higher interest assuming he handled new credit well. So, 

getting new credit after bk is no problem. I suggested to him, that new credit card use should be paid in full at the end of the 

month, so it doesn’t become bigger and bigger and go out of control. Further, he can get credit cards at Walmart, Visa or 

Mastercard, where the credit limit is set by the cash deposit on the account if he wants credit cards immediately for whatever 

reason. 




An alternative to Chapter 7 is Chapter 13, which I suggested he could use if he for some reason wanted to pay a portion of the 

$40K. I don’t suggest a Chapter 13, if you qualify for 7 because it makes absolutely no sense to do so. He felt guilty I think, 

about discharging the entire $40K in Chapter 7. Credit card companies factor in their cost of bad debt between 7-10%. In 

other words, they expect that between 7% to 10% of their card users will not be able to pay them back anything so that cost is 

already added to the interest everyone pays. They don’t really lose money on unpaid credit card debt. They just write them off 

as bad debt and sell the account to third parties at a fraction of the outstanding debt. I informed him that he may pay

between $150 to $300 in Chapter 13 for 36 to 60 months. So Chapter 13 costs $18K at $300 a month for 60 months. Then, if 

he completes 60 payments, the court will discharge $22K. On this point alone, Chapter 13 will cost $18K more than Chapter 7 

which costs zero.


Another alternative is debt settlement. This does not have a bankruptcy filing. Attempts to settle the $40K are made. Let’s just 

say the rule of thumb is that creditors will agree to cut the $40K by half for a lump sum payment to be made within 48 hours. In 

this situation, debtor has to have ready at least $20K for settlement. This is $20K more than Chapter 7, and inferior to Chapter 

13 because Chapter 13 allows a 5-year repayment plan supervised by the court.


The last alternative, is just do nothing and change your phone number. The problem with this is that creditors are apt to file 

lawsuits and will get a judgment that will result in wage garnishments in due time. In this situation, your credit score has no 

chance of improving within your lifetime, and you live in the constant fear that your payroll department will receive a wage 

garnishment notice, or your bank will receive a notice of levy on your bank account. Can you imagine even if half of the $40K 

got wage garnishments and bank levies? Client would have nothing left to pay rent and food! Why live like a rat under the 

sewer when you can start fresh without accumulated debt and benefit from rapid increase in your credit score if you handle 

your new credit right? 


Walt Disney filed for Chapter 7 twice, yet Disney is now a billion $ business worldwide. So, this is something good, not bad. 

You have to change the way you think about debt and opt for the most expeditious and simple way of getting fresh start in life 

without accumulated debt. Maybe you’re smarter than Mr. Disney and Chapter 7 may pave your way to being the next 

American below 50. Who knows? But certainly if you have accumulated debt that is not discharged, life will be very difficult for 

you and your family, and you will not get a fresh start in life.



If you need debt relief, set an appointment to see me. I will analyze your case personally.


“MAY THE GOD OF PEACE, WHO THROUGH THE BLOOD OF THE ETERNAL COVENANT BROUGHT BACK FROM THE DEAD OUR LORD JESUS, THAT GREAT SHEPHERD OF THE SHEEP, EQUIP YOU WITH EVERYTHING GOOD FOR DOING HIS WILL, AND MAY HE WORK IN US WHAT IS PLEASING TO HIM, THROUGH JESUS CHRIST, TO WHOM BE GLORY FOR EVER AND EVER.” HEBREWS 13:20


Lawrence B. Yang is a graduate of Georgetown University with a Master’s Degree in Law and specializes in Bankruptcy, Business, Real Estate and Civil Litigation.  He speaks English, Mandarin and Fujian and has successfully represented thousands of clients in California, including companies overseas.  Please call Angie, Barbara or Jess at (626) 284-1142 for an appointment at 20274 Carrey Road, Walnut, CA 91789 or1000 S. Fremont Ave., Mailstop 58, Building A-10 South Suite 10042, Alhambra, CA 91803.


把此文章分享到:

關於 楊清泉律師事務所