Clients
are young seniors at 62. Husband took an early retirement as he has a serious
illness. Two years ago, husband was diagnosed with stage 3 leukemia. He has
been undergoing treatment with a new cancer-fighting drug that is still
experimental. The cancer went into remission last year but resurfaced recently.
I sometimes wonder, with all our advanced technology that can send people to mars,
we still cannot cure cancer. Sure, certain cancers can now be fought
effectively if detected early enough and we know more about cancer now that we
did a couple of decades ago. There is of course our City of Hope that boasts of
being cutting edge on cancer treatment, but if you are unlucky enough to get
cancer, I am sure that the thought of dying sooner than later will certainly be
a constant thought in your mind. I’ve also heard of people who get cured of
cancer by stem cell therapy administered by a group of German doctors in
Mexico. The cost of treatment is about
$30K per session using stem cells from a fetus, which they provide. In any
event, the best thing that can happen for our loved ones & us, is that we
never get sick until we die of natural causes.
I
rely on Psalm 91, written by Moses a long time ago, for protection from cancer
and other illness for my loved ones & myself. In that Psalm, Moses says
that “Whoever goes to the Lord for safety, whoever remains under the protection
of the Almighty can say to Him, ‘you are my defender and protector, you are my
God, in you I trust.’ He will keep you safe from all hidden dangers and from all deadly diseases. So, like
Moses, I go to our Lord to keep my loved ones & I safe from all hidden
dangers and from all deadly diseases. Going back to clients, since husband fell
ill, he stopped working; hence his income went down as he now receives social
security at 62. He took early retirement. Normally, one would wait until 67 to
get full social security benefits. But with client’s illness, he may not be
around at 67 so he might as well start getting social security even if it’s a
lesser amount now.
Clients
are paying for a 2016 4 Runner. They pay $600 a month with 5 more years to go.
They feel that it’s too much of a debt burden and have decided to return the 4
Runner. The dealer told them that even with a voluntary return of the car, they
would still owe about $12K. This is called the voluntary car return deficiency.
What happens is that the dealer sells the returned car at wholesale and uses
the proceeds to pay a portion of the car loan. Since clients still have 5 years
on the car loan, at $600 a month, they owe $36K. The dealer anticipates selling
the car for $24K at wholesale. The sale proceeds of $24K will be used to pay
down the $36K, leaving a balance of $12. By contract, clients have agreed to
pay $36K for the car, so they are still contractually liable for the unpaid
difference of $12K even if the car has been returned.
In
addition, clients owe $40K of credit cards. They need $1200 a month for minimum
monthly payments. Since client only gets $1,100 from social security. It’s a no
brainer that they need to wipe out the $40K of credit cards as well as the $12K
voluntary car return deficiency. Clients have further decided to buy a cheaper
car where they will only pay about $200 a month or less on a lease. I told them
to go ahead and get a smaller car, which is consistent with pre bankruptcy
planning.
Second
client is 52. He owns a California S corporation, and has a residence that has
$300K equity. His import distribution business was doing well since it started
in 2002. But business turned south last year when gross sales went down by 30%.
With a 30% sales reduction, the company is losing money. He obtained a $50K
loan from bank, which required him to execute a personal guaranty for $50K.
Company has not paid the loan for several months. Bank then sued the company
and client on his personal guaranty last week. Since client has $300K of equity
in his house, the non-exempt portion of the homestead equity is $200K. That’s a
lot more than the $50K guaranty. Client does not qualify for Chapter 7 relief.
However, Chapter 13 will provide relief in that client will be given a
repayment plan of 60 months to pay $50K without interest, that’s about $850 a
month for 5 years. Since client now works for employer and has a gross salary
of $3,500 a month, and his wife also has some income, Chapter 13 will protect
his house from a judgment lien of $50K from the lawsuit. If he were to opt for
Chapter 7, he would lose his house. Trustee will sell his house, give him his
exempt equity of $100K, then use the $200K to pay the $50K and trustee
administrative and legal fees which will be substantial.
So
Chapter 7 is not the right way to go. Chapter 13, however, will provide
adequate relief while protecting his residence from a judgment lien. Besides,
Chapter 13 trustee have no power to sell debtor’s house.
“THE
LORD TAKES PLEASURE IN THOSE WHO FEAR HIM, IN THOSE WHO HOPE IN HIS STEADFAST
LOVE.” PSALM 147:11
Lawrence B. Yang is a graduate
of Georgetown University with a Master’s Degree in Law and specializes in
Bankruptcy, Business, Real Estate and Civil Litigation. He speaks English, Mandarin and Fujian and
has successfully represented thousands of clients in California, including
companies overseas. Please call Angie,
Barbara or Jess at (626) 284-1142 for an appointment at 1000 S. Fremont Ave.,
MAILSTOP 58 BUILDING A-1 SUITE 1125, Alhambra, CA OR at 20274 Carrey Road,
Walnut, CA 91789.
图片翻摄自网路,版权归原作者所有。如有侵权请联系我们,我们将及时处理。